<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Here Be Dragons &#187; john thompson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greendragonlane.com/tag/john-thompson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greendragonlane.com</link>
	<description>Observations from the Dragon's Lair.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cunning Ploy by John Thompson &amp; Partners</title>
		<link>http://www.greendragonlane.com/2009/03/cunning-ploy-by-john-thompson-partners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greendragonlane.com/2009/03/cunning-ploy-by-john-thompson-partners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Dragon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hounslow Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kew Bridge Road]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greendragonlane.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Seemingly with the cooperation of Hounslow Council, jT have submitted a revised planning application for the Kew Bridge site the only difference being that the number of residential units is reduced from 170 to 164.
Could it be that the real reason for this amended application is that all objections to the original application of 19 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.jtp.co.uk" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-204 alignleft" title="jt" src="http://www.greendragonlane.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/jt.gif" alt="jt" width="77" height="50" /></a><a href="http://planning.hounslow.gov.uk/planningv2/Planning_CaseNo.aspx?strCASENO=P/2008/1921" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-205 aligncenter" title="header1" src="http://www.greendragonlane.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/header1.gif" alt="header1" width="182" height="42" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Seemingly with the cooperation of Hounslow Council, jT have submitted <a href="http://planning.hounslow.gov.uk/planningv2/Planning_CaseNo.aspx?strCASENO=P/2008/1921" target="_blank">a revised planning</a> application for the Kew Bridge site the only difference being that the number of residential units is reduced from 170 to 164.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Could it be that the real reason for this amended application is that all objections to the original application of 19 June 2008 will no longer be considered for the superficially amended application and consequently all those who objected will have to do so again within 21 days of 19th March 2009 if they wish their voice to be heard?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Is this a ploy designed to reduce the amounts of compensation which may be payable to those most affected by this development?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">What part are Hounslow Council Planning Department playing in this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greendragonlane.com/2009/03/cunning-ploy-by-john-thompson-partners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- www.000webhost.com Analytics Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php"></script>
<noscript><a href="http://www.hosting24.com/"><img src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php" alt="web hosting" /></a></noscript>
<!-- End Of Analytics Code -->
